
(Image: Our Solar System, from Wikipedia’s entry on "Planets", public domain, by NASA.)
As luck will have it… the day I started using Digg.com, it offered me what a journalist on the BBC World Service this morning called "(…) potentially the news story of the century in terms of the future of human kind":
(The BBC, of course, have their own version: ‘New ‘super-Earth’ found in space‘)
Why I started "digging" yesterday was that a colleague of mine – after hearing about some of the stuff I do in corporate communications – had asked me if I’d like to help introduce some new collaborative news selection functionalities to Nokia’s intranet.
So I decided to get some first-hand experience with Digg. The concept seemed interesting and so I wanted to get a "feel" for how it works, what works and what doesn’t.
Being a novice to Digg, when I came across the "habitable planet" story I wasn’t quite sure how serious to take it. After all, I was just being taught by way of Neil Patel‘s Beginner’s Guide to Digg that, in order to get read, submissions to Digg should:
- Make a statement and do not be dull;
- Be controversial and make false promises; and/or
- Use keywords in the title that diggers love and that are also relevant to the story.
But, whoa, am I convinced now! Every news junkie has to hook on to Digg!
By the way, the planet story reminds me of a presentation to Pop!Tech, podcast on IT Conversations, in which Carolyn Porco, Imaging Team Leader of the Cassini Imaging Central Laboratory for Operations (CICLOPS) makes a passionate appeal to human kind to make space exploration a top priority.
From the podcast description:
"(…) [One of Saturn's moons], Titan, is where the Huygens probe landed in January 2005. From the panoramic images taken during the decent and the all the data that has been collected since, the CICLOPS team is excited to see signs that fluids once flowed over the surface, that the atmosphere has precipitation and that the probe itself may have landed on a shoreline. All-in-all, the Titan moon may give us a significant glimpse of what the Earth was like before living organisms. (…)"
PS: To support the point of yesterday’s piece on Wikipedia As A News Medium, the site’s entry on Gliese 581 c seems nicely up-to-date.
This is my term paper topic. Why would they call it a Super Earth if the temperature can’t support life? Doesn’t sound like a Super Earth to me…sounds like just another planet.