What makes being a “digital native” truly different?

The other day I left a comment on Jess's blog, musing that there must be a qualitative difference between having know life before the World Wide Web, and being a so-called ”digital native”.

Jess asked me to elaborate. Problem is, we ”immigrants” really don't know how life is different for kids who grew up with the Net. I can only offer a few observations to suggest that life must be different. If you have thought of other evidence – or counter-evidence -, please share. I'd like to understand this better.

By the way, I really think that the metaphor of ”digital immigrants” and ”digital natives” is flawed. If we have to converse in territorial terms, perhaps ”digital colonists” would be more apt? :-)

Anyhow, here's my two cents:

  • When I was a teenager, information generally was physically distributed. If you had a burning question which the people in your immediate presence couldn't answer, you would need to locate a physical source to find an answer. You would go to a library or contact some expert organization. With 24/7 Internet access, an answer from Google, the Wikipedia and your expert social network is only a few keystrokes away. So, my guess is that teenagers must have a different sense of ”where” information resides.
  • Reminds me of what Doc Searls calls the ”giant zero”, or how David Weinberger describes the Net in his book 'Small Pieces Loosely Joined – a unified theory of the web' as a ”spaceless place”, p. 40 etc. And that goes not only or information, but also for entities, i.e. people, groups and organizations. I would expect that members of the N-generation have a more natural sense for things not having a physical location. For people my age (41) this is probably more difficult to imagine.
  • Being always connected means living in two different worlds, a physical one and a virtual one, simultaneously. It will be fascinating to see if, how and to what extent these worlds merge in the perception of the N-generation. Already it seems that kids don't make the same distinction between being ”on line” and ”off line” as we do.
  • According to Gartner, 2009 will be the year when the first wave of ”digital natives” comes to the labor market, armed with social software tools, and the determination to do online whatever they please, even if that means bypassing the IT department.
  • David Weinberger mentioned in a video interview (approx. between 06:00 and 12:45 minutes) that youngsters have a different sense of privacy. For example, it is considered bad form for a hiring manager to check out a job applicant's Facebook info, much the same way that it is inappropriate to acknowledge the argument a couple are having on the street.
  • Part of the impact on education, for example, is that there is less and less sense in examining pupils' capacity to absorb information and reproduce facts from memory. Instead, the emphasis will need to shift towards teaching young people how to conduct research, how to filter, select, evaluate, assess, judge all those sources of information at their disposal. That's what a fair part of Dan Gillmor's essay on the 'Principles of a New Media Literacy' was about.

Yes, these are only sketchy bits. Please share your thoughts on what makes being a "digital native" truly different.

My top-8 podcasts of all times

Admittedly, I’m hooked on the Conversations Network :-)

In fact, surprised myself by having such a strong focus on technology in the top-3. But the truth is, these topics will have a huge impact on our future.

1. Pop!Tech 2004: Carolyn Porco, Cassini Science Imaging Team Leader: ‘Explorer’s Club’

"(…) Cassini Imaging Central Laboratory for Operations (CICLOPS) has been focused on Saturn since early 2004 as the Cassini spacecraft approached its orbit around the planet. (…) The icy moon Enceladus contains fissures that suggest tectonics, the south pole is especially warm and has signatures of organic material. (…) The other moon, Titan, is where the Huygens probe landed in January 2005. (…) the Titan moon may give us a significant glimpse of what the Earth was like before living organisms. (…) Lastly Carolyn shares some of her views on science and spirituality. (…)"

2. Pop!Tech 2004: Joel Garreau, Journalist, The Garreau Group: ‘Human Nature’

"(…) "Are we fundamentally changing human nature in our lifetime?" Joel Garreau thinks that yes we will be…over the next twenty years. What’s driving this? (…)" GRIN: genetics, robotics, Information and nanotech.

3. Tech Nation: Sandra Blakeslee, Contributor, NY Times

"(…) Dr. Moira Gunn speaks with NY Times contributor Sandra Blakeslee, about neuroscience, and how it is revealing how our brains map out our physical bodies. (…)"

4. Pop!Tech 2004: Ben Saunders, Solo Explorer

"(…) On his latest expedition in February 2004, Ben set out from Cape Arktichevsky in Northern Siberia in an attempt to be the first person in the world to make a complete crossing of the frozen Arctic Ocean in a 1,240-mile journey ending in Canada, solo and unsupported. (…) After experiencing first hand conditions described by NASA and Environment Canada as ‘the worst on record’, Ben has raised international awareness regarding the extent to which climate change is affecting the Arctic. He noticed conditions that were up to 15 degrees warmer than in 2000, and had to negotiate vast, unprecedented areas of thinning ice and open water. (…)"

5. Pop!Tech 2004: Doug Rushkoff: ‘Renaissance Prospects’

"(…) Douglas Rushkoff analyzes, writes and speaks about the way people, cultures, and institutions create, share, and influence each other’s values. He sees "media" as the landscape where this interaction takes place, and "literacy" as the ability to participate consciously in it. (…)"

6. O’Reilly Emerging Technology Conference 2005:
Chris Anderson, Wired Magazine: ‘Economics of the Long Tail’

"(…) he explores the economics of the long tail and shares his insight on the effects it might have on future business models. Chris discusses how distribution networks like Amazon, iTunes and Netflix have shown that the right side of the curve which forms millions of niches can be as big a market as the chart toppers. (…)"

7. O’Reilly Digital Democracy Teach-In:
Gatekeepers No More? The Grassroots Challenges the Journalistic Priesthood

"(…) Professional journalists have been the chief gatekeepers of news about political campaigns and governmental operations. That’s changing, fast, as the Internet and other technical tools open up a variety of avenues for other participants in the information process. (…)" With Dan Gillmor, Jeff Jarvis and Jay Rosen.

8. Pop!Tech 2005: Sam Harris, Author, The End of Faith: ‘The Future of Ideas’

"(…) Sam Harris debates many points relating to religion, particularly the dangers that can be brought about by religious extremists — in any faith — around the world (…)"

Runners-up:

Clayton Christensen, Professor, Harvard Business School: ‘Capturing the Upside’

"(…) Through his recent research, Professor Christensen has developed a set of theories to help guide managers as they seek to answer seven critical questions when trying to build new growth businesses, again and again: (…)"

Web 2.0 Conference: Lawrence Lessig

"(…) By presenting media remixing as the "creative writing" of the future he highlights the dangers of moving from a free culture where discussion and free speech are taken for granted, to a permission culture where permission to reproduce media messages will depend on the use of that media. (…)"

SDForum: Lawrence Lessig: ‘The Comedy of the Commons’

"(…) Lessig (…) charts a history of IP, which helps him highlight the difference between physical-property law, which can result in a tragedy of the commons, and intellectual-property law, which can result in a comedy of the commons. (…)"

Eben Moglen, Director, Software Freedom Law Center: ‘Freedom Businesses Protect Privacy’

"(…) Few, if any, presentations at conferences in the coming years will manage to combine the intellectual depth and delivery skills shown by Software Freedom Law Center director Eben Moglen in this penetrating analysis of privacy and technology. (…)"

Tech Nation: Dr. Steven Miles, Author & Professor, University of Minnesota

"(…) Dr. Moira Gunn talks to Dr. Steven Miles, the Minnesota MD who studied tens of thousands of documents released by the Department of Defense about US military prisons in Iraq. Included were those from the notorious Abu Ghurayb prison near Baghdad. What Dr. Miles found was extremely disturbing. (…)"

MeshForum 2005: Jamais Cascio: ‘Participatory Panopticon’

Jamais Cascio‘s ‘Participatory Panopticon’, a presentation at the
MeshForum 2005 Event held in Chicago, Il, May 1-4, 2005 and podcast via
IT Conversations, takes the "memory prosthesis" concept of Nokia
Lifeblog
a few steps further.

"(…) [S]elf-proclaimed freelance world-builder, [Jamais] has a bold vision for the future. He calls it the Participatory Panopticon, and it spells the end of privacy and the end of secrecy. While personal privacy is eroding, the ability of those in power to lie, cheat, and steal is also becoming increasingly impaired. (…)"

Tech Nation: Greenfield v. Kurzweil: ‘Biotech: Will it Save Us or Hurt Us?’

"(…) Baroness Susan Greenfield, Director of the Royal Institution of Great Britain, debates Ray Kurzweil, one of America’s most prolific inventors and a futuristic thinker in his own right. Will biotechnology save us? Or hurt us? (…)"

Pop!Tech 2005: Susan Blackmore, Author and lecturer: ‘Memes’

"(…) Memetics is an intellectually rich but controversial field which seeks to explain how our minds and cultures are designed by natural selection acting on replicating information, just as organisms evolve by natural selection acting on genes. (…)"

Continue reading

Privacy concerns about Smart Digg Button

[UPDATE, May 24, 2007: In his post on HitTail's blog, 'Online Marketing Webinars Coming Soon to HitTail', Mike Levin inadvertently links to the post you're looking at. Instead, the link from Mike's post should really point at: 'Can I talk to you about "northern exposure videos" for a moment?']

Out of the 74 responses to date to Derek van Vliet‘s Smart Digg Button for Firefox, only one, by Muhammad, expresses concerns about privacy, "(…) as this extension tells Digg about every page you’re visiting for as long as it’s enabled (…)".

Derek, I’m certain this is a serious concern to many potential users. Would you care to respond?

Continue reading